skip to main  |
      skip to sidebar
          
        
          
        
Anklage gegen den mächtigten Partei Chef Ahmed Dogan in Bulgarien wegen Korruuption
Bulgarian court acquits Ahmed Dogan in conflict of interest case
Mon, Feb 14 2011 15:58 CET          
A  five-judge panel of Bulgaria's Supreme Administrative Court (SAC)  found  controversial politician Ahmed Dogan innocent on charges of  conflict of  interest in a case that saw him receive a one million euro  consultancy  fee from state-owned electricity utility NEK.
The  panel confirmed  the earlier ruling of a three-judge panel and cannot be  appealed  further. In its reasoning, the court said that Dogan's  consultancy  contract was signed before January 1 2009, when the  Bulgaria's law on  conflict of interest went into force, even though  part of the payment  was carried out when the law was already in effect.
The  contract  in question was signed between Dogan and the private  Institute of Mining  with the help of Minstroy Holding, one of the  subcontractors at the  Tsankov Kamuk hydro-power array, developed by NEK  at a total cost  estimated at 460 million euro.
Dogan is the  leader of the  predominantly ethnic Turk Movement for Rights and  Freedoms (MRF), which  nominally held the Government mandate in 2005/09,  when Bulgaria was  governed by a Socialist-led tripartite coalition  that included MRF.
"The  claims that a member of Parliament could  influence political decisions  in his role as mandate-holder during  this period and as the leader of a  political party are outside legal  considerations and do not prove the  real possibility of the person  under investigation of exercising  influence, using his power, to  acquire the respective benefit," the  court said.
The SAC chose  to disregard Dogan's campaign speech  from 2009, when he told voters  that he was "an instrument of power" and  could greatly influence the  distribution of state funds.
"The  court must find violations by  following strictly defined procedural  rules and proof admissible by law  – parliamentary session protocols,  contracts, equity statements and  written proof of money transfer," the court said.     
 
 
 
          
      
 
  
 
 
 
  
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen